[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172623730520.4076253.7175037716930825765.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:24:24 -0500
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: document RerVision
A33-Vstar board
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:48:44 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> RerVision A33-Vstar is an evaluation board of their A33-Core1 SoM.
>
> Add its compatible (with the SoM compatible) to the sunxi board DT
> binding file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.
Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.
If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y allwinner/sun8i-a33-vstar.dtb' for 20240913104845.4112986-1-uwu@...nowy.me:
arch/arm/boot/dts/allwinner/sun8i-a33-vstar.dtb: hub@1: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'ethernet@4' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/genesys,gl850g.yaml#
Powered by blists - more mailing lists