[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240913-honest-mindful-ermine-514d3e@leitao>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 07:35:47 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Maksym Kutsevol <max@...sevol.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] netpoll: Make netpoll_send_udp return
status instead of void
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:28:51AM -0700, Maksym Kutsevol wrote:
> netpoll_send_udp can return if send was successful.
> It will allow client code to be aware of the send status.
>
> Possible return values are the result of __netpoll_send_skb (cast to int)
> and -ENOMEM. This doesn't cover the case when TX was not successful
> instantaneously and was scheduled for later, __netpoll__send_skb returns
> success in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maksym Kutsevol <max@...sevol.com>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Thanks for addressing it. Two things you might want to consider:
1) There are some warnings related to this patch.
a) Not CCed maintainers
b) WARNING: line length of 95 exceeds 80 columns
You can see them here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240912173608.1821083-2-max@kutsevol.com/
Also, this might conflict with the refactor I did a while ago, so, you
might need to rebase:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910100410.2690012-1-leitao@debian.org/
Other than that, I am happy with it.
Thanks for doing it
-breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists