linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] page_pool: fix build on powerpc with GCC 14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <498e7990-2c81-4779-83e6-1ff072796dbd@csgroup.eu>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:55:30 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
 Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] page_pool: fix build on powerpc with GCC 14



Le 14/09/2024 à 04:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> writes:
>> Building net-next with powerpc with GCC 14 compiler results in this
>> build error:
>>
>> /home/sfr/next/tmp/ccuSzwiR.s: Assembler messages:
>> /home/sfr/next/tmp/ccuSzwiR.s:2579: Error: operand out of domain (39 is
>> not a multiple of 4)
>> make[5]: *** [/home/sfr/next/next/scripts/Makefile.build:229:
>> net/core/page_pool.o] Error 1
>>
>> Root caused in this thread:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/913e2fbd-d318-4c9b-aed2-4d333a1d5cf0@cs-soprasteria.com/
> 
> Sorry I'm late to this, the original report wasn't Cc'ed to linuxppc-dev :D
> 
> I think this is a bug in the arch/powerpc inline asm constraints.
> 
> Can you try the patch below, it fixes the build error for me.
> 
> I'll run it through some boot tests and turn it into a proper patch over
> the weekend.
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
> index 5bf6a4d49268..0e41c1da82dd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
>   #define __atomic_release_fence()					\
>   	__asm__ __volatile__(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory")
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +#define DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT "Z<>"
> +#else
> +#define DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT "YZ<>"
> +#endif

I see we have the same in uaccess.h, added by commit 2d43cc701b96 
("powerpc/uaccess: Fix build errors seen with GCC 13/14")

Should that go in a common header, maybe ppc_asm.h ?

> +
>   static __inline__ int arch_atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
>   {
>   	int t;
> @@ -197,7 +203,7 @@ static __inline__ s64 arch_atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PREFIXED))
>   		__asm__ __volatile__("ld %0,0(%1)" : "=r"(t) : "b"(&v->counter));
>   	else
> -		__asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m<>"(v->counter));
> +		__asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT (v->counter));
>   
>   	return t;
>   }
> @@ -208,7 +214,7 @@ static __inline__ void arch_atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PREFIXED))
>   		__asm__ __volatile__("std %1,0(%2)" : "=m"(v->counter) : "r"(i), "b"(&v->counter));
>   	else
> -		__asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m<>"(v->counter) : "r"(i));
> +		__asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=" DS_FORM_CONSTRAINT (v->counter) : "r"(i));
>   }
>   
>   #define ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op)						\
>