[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cad9977-7133-4d53-a704-4ef80093f2db@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:07:48 +0200
From: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@...il.com>
To: Qianqiang Liu <qianqiang.liu@....com>
Cc: jagathjog1996@...il.com, jic23@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: There is a potential buffer overflow issue in bmi323
On 12/09/24 11:50, Qianqiang Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reviewed the following code in drivers/iio/imu/bmi323/bmi323_core.c:
>
> 2245 for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bmi323_ext_reg_savestate); i++) { <-
> 2246 ret = bmi323_write_ext_reg(data, bmi323_reg_savestate[i], <-
> 2247 savestate->reg_settings[i]);
> 2248 if (ret) {
> 2249 dev_err(data->dev,
> 2250 "Error writing bmi323 external reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> 2251 bmi323_reg_savestate[i], ret);
> 2252 return ret;
> 2253 }
> 2254 }
>
> The array size of the "bmi323_ext_reg_savestate" is twelve, and the
> array size of "bmi323_reg_savestate" is nine.
>
> Is it possible that "bmi323_reg_savestate" may have buffer overflow
> issue?
>
Hi,
You are very right and that is copy/paste mistake that was not flagged as a warning by gcc.
Thanks for letting me know!
There is currently a fix already sent for review here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240909-iio-bmi323-fix-array-ref-v1-1-51c220f22229@kernel.org
Best regards,
Denis Benato
Powered by blists - more mailing lists