[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuXl8VhcmTMY3zNr@google.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:37:21 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@...a.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] unwind, perf: sframe user space unwinding,
deferred perf callchains
Hello Josh,
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 01:02:02AM +0200, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> This is a new version of sframe user space unwinding + perf deferred
> callchains. Better late than never.
>
> Unfortunately I didn't get a chance to do any testing with this one yet
> as I'm rushing it out the door before GNU Cauldron starts.
> Conference-driven development ;-)
lol
>
> Plus I don't have the perf tool piece working yet so I don't have a way
> of doing end-to-end testing at the moment anyway.
>
> In other words, please don't merge this yet.
>
> Namhyung, if you're still available to write a perf tool patch which
> integrates with this, that would be great. Otherwise I could give it a
> try.
Sure, I'll take a look and post the perf tools patches.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists