[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e89e5bcbd43934c65f8da23e7fbd59da950a0a3.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 05:40:15 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@....com>, Dietmar Eggemann
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kprateek.nayak@....com, wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/24] sched/uclamg: Handle delayed dequeue
On Fri, 2024-09-13 at 18:39 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> tip 4c293d0fa315 (sans sched/eevdf: More PELT vs DELAYED_DEQUEUE) seems
> to be stable.
Belay that, it went boom immediately this morning while trying to
trigger a warning I met elsewhere.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists