| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202409160059.VIbC9G04-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 00:43:19 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: yongli-oc <yongli-oc@...oxin.com>, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yongli@...oxin.com,
louisqi@...oxin.com, cobechen@...oxin.com, jiangbowang@...oxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] locking/osq_lock: The numa-aware lock memory
prepare, assign and cleanup.
Hi yongli-oc,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core]
[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable linus/master v6.11-rc7 next-20240913]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/yongli-oc/locking-osq_lock-The-Kconfig-for-dynamic-numa-aware-osq-lock/20240914-172336
base: tip/locking/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240914085327.32912-5-yongli-oc%40zhaoxin.com
patch subject: [PATCH 4/4] locking/osq_lock: The numa-aware lock memory prepare, assign and cleanup.
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240916/202409160059.VIbC9G04-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240916/202409160059.VIbC9G04-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409160059.VIbC9G04-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/locking/zx_numa.c:250:10: warning: variable 'left' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
250 | u32 left = 0;
| ^
>> kernel/locking/zx_numa.c:375:6: warning: variable 'err' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
375 | int err = 0;
| ^
2 warnings generated.
vim +/left +250 kernel/locking/zx_numa.c
203
204 static void zx_numa_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
205 {
206 int i = 0;
207 int checktimes = 2;
208
209 //reboot or power off state
210 if (READ_ONCE(enable_zx_numa_osq_lock) == 0xf)
211 return;
212
213 if (atomic_read(&numa_count) == 0) {
214 if (READ_ONCE(dynamic_enable) != 0)
215 schedule_delayed_work(&zx_numa_cleanup_work, 60*HZ);
216 return;
217 }
218
219 for (i = 0; i < zx_numa_lock_total; i++) {
220 int s = 0;
221 u32 lockaddr = READ_ONCE(zx_numa_entry[i].lockaddr);
222 u32 type = zx_numa_entry[i].type;
223 struct _numa_lock *buf = zx_numa_entry[i].numa_ptr;
224 int nodes = 0;
225
226 if (lockaddr == 0 || type == 3 || zx_numa_entry[i].idle == 0)
227 continue;
228 nodes = buf->numa_nodes;
229 if (zx_numa_entry[i].idle < checktimes) {
230
231 s = zx_check_numa_dynamic_locked(lockaddr, buf, 1);
232 if (s != 0) {
233 zx_numa_entry[i].idle = 1;
234 continue;
235 }
236 zx_numa_entry[i].idle++;
237 }
238
239 if (zx_numa_entry[i].idle == checktimes) {
240 zx_numa_lock_stopping(buf);
241 zx_numa_entry[i].idle++;
242
243 }
244
245 if (zx_numa_entry[i].idle == checktimes+1) {
246 while (1) {
247 if (zx_numa_lock64_try_to_freeze(lockaddr, buf,
248 i) == nodes + 1) {
249 //all node has been locked
> 250 u32 left = 0;
251
252 left = atomic_dec_return(&numa_count);
253 break;
254 }
255 cpu_relax(); cpu_relax();
256 cpu_relax(); cpu_relax();
257 }
258 }
259 }
260 schedule_delayed_work(&zx_numa_cleanup_work, 60*HZ);
261 }
262
263 static int create_numa_buffer_list(int clusters, int len)
264 {
265 int i = 0;
266
267 for (i = 0; i < zx_numa_lock_total; i++) {
268 struct _numa_lock *s = (struct _numa_lock *)kmem_cache_alloc(
269 zx_numa_lock_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
270 if (!s) {
271 while (i > 0) {
272 kmem_cache_free(zx_numa_lock_cachep,
273 zx_numa_entry[i-1].numa_ptr);
274 i--;
275 }
276 return 0;
277 }
278 memset((char *)s, 0,
279 len * L1_CACHE_BYTES * (clusters + NUMAEXPAND));
280 numa_lock_init_data(s, clusters, NUMA_LOCKED_VAL, 0);
281 zx_numa_entry[i].numa_ptr = s;
282 zx_numa_entry[i].lockaddr = 0;
283 zx_numa_entry[i].highaddr = 0;
284 zx_numa_entry[i].idle = 0;
285 zx_numa_entry[i].type = 0;
286 }
287
288 for (i = 0; i < zx_numa_lock_total; i++) {
289 zx_numa_entry[i].index = i;
290 list_add_tail(&(zx_numa_entry[i].list), &_zx_numa_lock_head);
291 }
292 return 1;
293 }
294
295 static int zx_numa_lock_init(int numa)
296 {
297 int align = max_t(int, L1_CACHE_BYTES, ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN);
298 int d = 0;
299 int status = 0;
300
301 atomic_set(&lockindex, 0);
302 atomic_set(&numa_count, 0);
303
304 if (sizeof(struct _numa_lock) & 0x3f)
305 d = (int)((sizeof(struct _numa_lock) + L1_CACHE_BYTES) /
306 L1_CACHE_BYTES);
307 else
308 d = (int)(sizeof(struct _numa_lock) / L1_CACHE_BYTES);
309
310 zx_numa_entry_cachep = kmem_cache_create(
311 "zx_numa_entry",
312 sizeof(struct _numa_buf) * zx_numa_lock_total, align,
313 SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
314
315 zx_numa_lock_cachep = kmem_cache_create(
316 "zx_numa_lock",
317 d * L1_CACHE_BYTES * (numa + NUMAEXPAND), align,
318 SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
319
320
321 if (zx_numa_entry_cachep && zx_numa_lock_cachep) {
322 zx_numa_entry = (struct _numa_buf *)kmem_cache_alloc(
323 zx_numa_entry_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
324 if (zx_numa_entry) {
325 memset((char *)zx_numa_entry, 0,
326 sizeof(struct _numa_buf) * zx_numa_lock_total);
327 create_numa_buffer_list(numa, d);
328 status = 1;
329 }
330 }
331
332 pr_info("enable dynamic numa-aware osq_lock, clusters %d\n",
333 numa);
334 return status;
335 }
336
337
338 #define numa_lock_proc_dir "zx_numa_lock"
339 #define zx_numa_enable_dir "dynamic_enable"
340 #define numa_entry_total 8
341 struct proc_dir_entry *numa_lock_proc;
342 struct proc_dir_entry *numa_lock_enable;
343 struct proc_dir_entry *numa_proc_entry[numa_entry_total];
344
345 static ssize_t numa_lock_proc_read(struct file *file,
346 char __user *usrbuf, size_t len, loff_t *off)
347 {
348 int id = (long) pde_data(file_inode(file));
349 char kbuffer[128];
350 ssize_t retval = 0;
351 size_t n = 0;
352
353 memset(kbuffer, 0, sizeof(kbuffer));
354 if (id == 0)
355 n = sprintf(kbuffer, "%d\n", READ_ONCE(dynamic_enable));
356 else if (id == 1)
357 n = sprintf(kbuffer, "%d\n", READ_ONCE(osq_lock_depth));
358 else if (id == 2)
359 n = sprintf(kbuffer, "%d\n", READ_ONCE(osq_keep_times));
360 else if (id == 3)
361 n = sprintf(kbuffer, "%d\n", READ_ONCE(osq_node_max));
362 else if (id == 4)
363 n = sprintf(kbuffer, "%d\n", atomic_read(&numa_count));
364 retval = simple_read_from_buffer(usrbuf, len, off, kbuffer, n);
365
366 return retval;
367 }
368
369 static ssize_t numa_lock_proc_write(struct file *file,
370 const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *f_pos)
371 {
372 int id = (long) pde_data(file_inode(file));
373 char kbuffer[128];
374 unsigned long new = 0;
> 375 int err = 0;
376
377 memset(kbuffer, 0, sizeof(kbuffer));
378 if (copy_from_user(kbuffer, buffer, count))
379 return count;
380 kbuffer[count] = '\0';
381 err = kstrtoul(kbuffer, 10, &new);
382
383 if (id == 0) {
384 int last = READ_ONCE(dynamic_enable);
385
386 if (new < 0 || new >= 2 || last == new)
387 return count;
388
389 if (last == 0) {
390 prefetchw(&enable_zx_numa_osq_lock);
391 //enable to the 2-bytes-tail osq-lock
392 prefetchw(&enable_zx_numa_osq_lock);
393 WRITE_ONCE(enable_zx_numa_osq_lock, 2);
394 schedule_delayed_work(&zx_numa_cleanup_work, 60*HZ);
395 }
396 prefetchw(&dynamic_enable);
397 WRITE_ONCE(dynamic_enable, new);
398 return count;
399 }
400
401 if (READ_ONCE(dynamic_enable) != 0) {
402 pr_info("dynamic %d: change setting should disable dynamic\n",
403 dynamic_enable);
404 return count;
405 }
406 if (id == 1 && new > 4 && new <= 32)
407 WRITE_ONCE(osq_lock_depth, new);
408 else if (id == 2 && new >= 16 && new <= 2048)
409 WRITE_ONCE(osq_keep_times, new);
410 else if (id == 3 && new > 4 && new <= 2048)
411 WRITE_ONCE(osq_node_max, new);
412 return count;
413 }
414 static int numa_lock_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
415 {
416 return 0;
417 }
418
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists