linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] ARM: dts: amlogic: fix /memory node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFBinCB8dhzNExOaO=VrDzTYLHHKUaxHZ49HzAYVnNZhAT_YFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:05:51 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, 
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ARM: dts: amlogic: fix /memory node name

Hi Neil,

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:19 PM Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org> wrote:
[...]
> -       memory {
> +       memory@0 {
>                 device_type = "memory";
>                 reg = <0x40000000 0x80000000>;
On the 32-bit SoCs we specify memory at an 0x40000000 offset.
Shouldn't we use memory@...00000 in that case?