[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240915142233.168da2dcd06000dc86a34a1e@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 14:22:33 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fgraph: Do not save calltime in shadow stack
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 17:48:05 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> Now that there's more users of the function graph infrastructure, the
> calltime field on the shadow stack wastes space and also getting the
> timestamp is a waste of time for those that do not use it.
>
> Instead, have the only two users of it (function graph tracer and the
> profiler) store it in its own shadow stack variable.
This series looks good to me. Instead of adding add-hoc flag, this
solves call-time clearer.
For this series,
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you,
>
> Steven Rostedt (3):
> fgraph: Use fgraph data to store subtime for profiler
> ftrace: Use a running sleeptime instead of saving in shadow stack
> ftrace: Have calltime be saved in the fgraph storage
>
> ----
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 5 +--
> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
> kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 45 +++++++++++++------
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 1 +
> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 6 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists