[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZugAeVWeMZGtjYme@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:55:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Parker Newman <parker@...est.io>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Parker Newman <pnewman@...necttech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] misc: eeprom: eeprom_93cx6: Replace
printk(KERN_ERR ...) with pr_err()
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:58:50PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:55:40AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote:
...
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: timeout\n", __func__);
> > + pr_err("%s: timeout\n", __func__);
>
> It's a device, please use dev_err().
The problem is that this library doesn't know about this fact. I.e. it would
need a new member just for this message. Instead, maybe drop the message as we
anyway get a unique enough error code?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists