linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf/test: perf test 86 fails on s390 repo linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240916125718.3024270-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:57:18 +0200
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        acme@...nel.org
Cc: agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/test: perf test 86 fails on s390 repo linux-next

Command perf test 86 fails on s390 using linux-next repository:
 # perf test -F 86
 ping 868299 [007] 28248.013596: probe_libc:inet_pton_1: (3ff95948020)
 3ff95948020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
 3ff9595e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
 3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
 FAIL: expected backtrace entry \
	 "main\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
	 got "3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)"
 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping  : FAILED!
 #

The root cause is a new stack layout, some functions have been added
as seen below. Add text_to_binary_address and friends to the
list of expected functions.

 # perf script | tac | grep -m1 '^ping' -B9 | tac
 ping  866856 [007] 25979.494921: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ff8ec48020)
	     3ff8ec48020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
	     3ff8ec5e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
	     3ff8ec5e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
	     3ff8ec5e6e7 getaddrinfo+0x1007 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
	     2aa3fe04bf5 main+0xff5 (/usr/bin/ping)
	     3ff8eb34a5b __libc_start_call_main+0x8b (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
	     3ff8eb34b5d __libc_start_main@...BC_2.2+0xad (inlined)
	     2aa3fe06a1f [unknown] (/usr/bin/ping)

 #

Output after:
 # perf test -F 86
 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping  : Ok
 #

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
index f38c8ead0b03..bc6e2fe1d999 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
 	case "$(uname -m)" in
 	s390x)
 		eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
+		echo "text_to_binary_address\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
+		echo "gaih_inet\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
 		echo "(__GI_)?getaddrinfo\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
 		echo "main\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$" >> $expected
 		;;
-- 
2.46.0