[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240916135643.GA23958@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:56:43 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] function_graph: remove unnecessary initialization in
ftrace_graph_ret_addr()
After the commit 29c1c24a2707 ("function_graph: Fix up ftrace_graph_ret_addr()")
ftrace_graph_ret_addr() doesn't need to initialize "int i" at the start.
While at it, move the declaration of "ret_stack" into the main loop.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
index d7d4fb403f6f..d45a8bc97997 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
@@ -890,9 +890,8 @@ ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(struct task_struct *task, int idx)
unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx,
unsigned long ret, unsigned long *retp)
{
- struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
unsigned long return_handler = (unsigned long)dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(return_to_handler);
- int i = task->curr_ret_stack;
+ int i;
if (ret != return_handler)
return ret;
@@ -902,7 +901,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx,
i = *idx ? : task->curr_ret_stack;
while (i > 0) {
- ret_stack = get_ret_stack(task, i, &i);
+ struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack = get_ret_stack(task, i, &i);
if (!ret_stack)
break;
/*
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Powered by blists - more mailing lists