[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuhBymvNiB_8sWMu@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:33:46 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...a.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nmi,printk: fix ABBA deadlock between nmi_backtrace
and dump_stack_lvl
On Fri 2024-09-13 13:25:33, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 17:08 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Wed 2024-07-24 16:51:46, John Ogness wrote:
> >
> >
> > I see. I agree that deferring printk on that CPU [0] is the right
> > solution.
> >
> > > [0]
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87plrcqyii.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de
> >
> Hi Petr,
>
> we have been running with John Ogness's fix (from the mail linked
> above) for about a month now, and it has reduced the number of
> deadlocks in the Linux kernel in our fleet by maybe 90%, comparing
> a kernel with the fix, to a kernel without the fix.
>
> Would it be possible to get John Ogness's fix queued up for merging
> in the printk tree, and then later to Linus?
Sure. Thanks for reminder.
John, could you please send the fix as a proper patch with some
reasonable commit message?
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists