[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240916-profanity-superjet-33a08a8b0b3f@spud>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:56:58 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>,
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/14] riscv: Add ghostwrite vulnerability
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:44:04AM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> I figured that since T-Head didn't feel it was
> valuable to change the archid/implid between cores that Linux shouldn't
> go out of its way to fix the granularity issue.
I mean, when you put it like that, I'm not particularly inclined to
disagree...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists