[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240916185905.5704-A-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:59:05 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 04/19] function_graph: Replace fgraph_ret_regs with
ftrace_regs
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:29:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:16:56 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This does not pass the ftrace selftests. Please merge the patch below
> > into this patch. With that:
> >
> > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Thank you very much, this is why I wanted arch maintainers acks before
> taking anything.
>
> There may be other patches in this series that I didn't Cc everyone
> (yet). Did you look at the other patches? If not, I'll go and do the Cc.
> It's a manual process.
I just had a quick look and tried Masami's git tree with the
topic/fprobe-on-fgraph branch and tried the ftrace selftests, which
resulted in the provided small fix.
But now that you ask, I can see that FPROBE is not available on s390
anymore with the full series, since HAVE_FTRACE_GRAPH_FUNC is not
available.
Also the s390 variant of arch_ftrace_fill_perf_regs() seems to be
incorrect.
Looks like some work is needed from our side.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists