linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fall back to kcalloc() for no SCM device bound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <994f9631-f836-47de-a275-5c20183b84e5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:28:25 -0700
From: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@...il.com>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Andrew Halaney
 <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fall back to kcalloc() for no
 SCM device bound

> Actually, taking only the first patch in this series should be enough to
> fix the crash Rudraksha reported. None of the older platforms should
> ever reach into this if statement. I think the rough story is:

Yep, just tested this right now, and the first patch alone seems to do 
the trick!