lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c51a8065-2052-4a4e-b871-c0bd8d834548@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:21:32 +0300
From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>,
 Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>,
 Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: add schema for NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs

On 9/12/2024 5:03 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 12/09/2024 15:36:46+0300, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
>>> Then should this mux be registered in the CCF so you can use the usual
>>> clock node properties?
>>
>> Hello Alexandre,
>>
>> In hardware, these clock muxes and divisors are part of the RTC module
>> itself and not external. Therefore, I would say no.
> 
> This is irrelevant, if this is a clock mux, it must be in the CCF, just
> as when the RTC has a clock output.
> 
> 

I understand your point, but taking into account the fact that FIRC 
clock should be used in most scenarios, would it be acceptable to not 
export this 'clksel' property in the devicetree bindings and simply use 
the FIRC clock by default in the RTC driver ?

At least for this patchset, in order to ease the review process. If 
configurable clock source support would want to be enabled and exported 
via bindings for this S32G2/S32G3 RTC driver, then CCF registration for 
this clk mux could be added in future patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ