[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtghCMk_DiGJ=7pHoLhb=LUS1hXe0F0P5YFYJ-K+aUtcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:15:13 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: rustgcc-kselftest: error: unknown unstable option: `patchable-function-entry`
On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 00:53, Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 9:17 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The x86 rust gcc builds failed on the Linux next-20240917 due to following build
> > warnings / errors with rustgcc for selftests rust builds.
> >
> > First seen on next-20240917
> > Good: next-20240913
> > BAD: next-20240917
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks for the report -- this should be already fixed in `rust-next`
> for tomorrow (requirement changed from `!FINEIBT` to `!CALL_PADDING`),
> please see https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72=B9NmC=1eSaOrg7XutjueQsSXGcBQb7dQFPuL0SFjPsA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> If you can confirm it is, that would be great, thanks! i.e. you will
> need either to disable `CALL_PADDING` or use a newer Rust compiler
> version.
I will try to use the newer Rust Compiler.
>
> By the way, I think you meant next-202409176, not next-20240917?
Right, I mean next-20240916.
- Naresh
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists