[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240917124026.qzefy743r54w5pwx@DEN-DL-M70577>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:40:26 +0000
From: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Lars Povlsen
<lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ocelot: document lan969x-pinctrl
> > > > reg:
> > > > items:
> > > > @@ -85,6 +95,12 @@ allOf:
> > > > contains:
> > > > enum:
> > > > - microchip,lan966x-pinctrl
> > > > + - microchip,lan9698-pinctrl
> > > > + - microchip,lan9696-pinctrl
> > > > + - microchip,lan9694-pinctrl
> > > > + - microchip,lan9693-pinctrl
> > > > + - microchip,lan9692-pinctrl
> > >
> > > > + - microchip,lan9691-pinctrl
> > >
> > > This should work on its own, since the other devices here have it as a
> > > fallback.
> >
> > Just to be clear - we only need the "microchip,lan9691-pinctrl" here?
>
> Ye, in the enum you should only need that compatible (in addition to the
> exsting one) because lan9691 is the fallback for all the others and
> therefore the compatible must contain it.
OK, got it.
Thanks Conor.
/Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists