[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSmn=SEwq3je3+vJ-S1Rwb=cLT2a3_WKOQsHu9xZYEZhrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:02:31 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] list: test: Mending tests for list_cut_position()
On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 12:35, I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Mending test for list_cut_position*() for the missing check of integer
> "i" after the second loop. The variable should be checked for second
> time to make sure both lists after the cut operation are formed as
> expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
> ---
Alas, this breaks the list test, as we're comparing the entries we get
from list_for_each() with entries[i], so changing the value of 'i'
will compare against the wrong elements.
You could either update the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ at the bottom to verify
the _total_ number of elements (which should be fine, as we already
verify the value of i after the first loop), or compare each entry
against, e.g., &entries[2 + i].
This is causing a test failure on -next:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202409161554.6c3e8d5d-oliver.sang@intel.com/
Could we remove this from mm-nonmm pending a fix?
Cheers,
-- David
> lib/list-test.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c
> index 37cbc33e9fdb..8d1d47a9fe9e 100644
> --- a/lib/list-test.c
> +++ b/lib/list-test.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,13 @@ static void list_test_list_cut_position(struct kunit *test)
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2);
>
> + i = 0;
> list_for_each(cur, &list1) {
> KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]);
Either change this to &entries[2 + i], or...
> i++;
> }
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);
This to expect i == 3
> }
>
> static void list_test_list_cut_before(struct kunit *test)
> @@ -432,10 +435,13 @@ static void list_test_list_cut_before(struct kunit *test)
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);
>
> + i = 0;
> list_for_each(cur, &list1) {
> KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]);
Either change this to &entries[1 + i], or...
> i++;
> }
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2);
This to expect i == 3.
> }
>
> static void list_test_list_splice(struct kunit *test)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5294 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists