[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172665462666.8208.13856585668352326031.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 04:17:06 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: philipp.reisner@...bit.com, lars.ellenberg@...bit.com,
christoph.boehmwalder@...bit.com, Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@...il.com>
Cc: drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@...il.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: Fix atomicity violation in drbd_uuid_set_bm()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:35:04 +0800, Qiu-ji Chen wrote:
> The violation of atomicity occurs when the drbd_uuid_set_bm function is
> executed simultaneously with modifying the value of
> device->ldev->md.uuid[UI_BITMAP]. Consider a scenario where, while
> device->ldev->md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] passes the validity check when its value
> is not zero, the value of device->ldev->md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] is written to
> zero. In this case, the check in drbd_uuid_set_bm might refer to the old
> value of device->ldev->md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] (before locking), which allows
> an invalid value to pass the validity check, resulting in inconsistency.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] drbd: Fix atomicity violation in drbd_uuid_set_bm()
commit: 2f02b5af3a4482b216e6a466edecf6ba8450fa45
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists