[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <iebfjkoxcbnh3akw2dev7kwj4ae2yazrlhdpw657z53p6exx2f@tj7ol6gix2dy>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:37:23 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
Cc: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...nkonzept.com>, Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>,
Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>, Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@...cinc.com>,
Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] interconnect: qcom: add QCS8300 interconnect
provider driver
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 03:10:34PM GMT, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>
>
> On 9/11/2024 4:18 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:10:13AM GMT, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
> >> Add driver for the Qualcomm interconnect buses found in QCS8300
> >> based platforms. The topology consists of several NoCs that are
> >> controlled by a remote processor that collects the aggregated
> >> bandwidth for each master-slave pairs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig | 11 +
> >> drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile | 2 +
> >> drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcs8300.c | 2088 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcs8300.h | 177 +++
> >> 4 files changed, 2278 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcs8300.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcs8300.h
> >
> > The driver looks pretty close to sa8775p one. Would it make sense to
> > have a single driver instead? Or would it complicate things
> > significantly?
> >
>
> Yes, the target is close to sa8775p. but there are differences in the topology and same driver cannot be used for both targets.
Ack
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists