[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240918103412.0ce158d9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 10:34:12 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Luis Chamberlain
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, Usama Arif
<usamaarif642@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the mm
tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:21:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/huge_mm.h
>
> between commit:
>
> bc47772ebe8b ("mm: introduce a pageflag for partially mapped folios")
>
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
>
> fd031210c9ce ("mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks")
>
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 0b0539f4ee1a,7c50aeed0522..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@@ -326,14 -316,15 +328,15 @@@ unsigned long thp_get_unmapped_area_vmf
> unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags,
> vm_flags_t vm_flags);
>
> -bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int *pextra_pins);
> +bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
> int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> unsigned int new_order);
> + int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
> static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
> {
> - return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, 0);
> + return split_folio(page_folio(page));
> }
> -void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio);
> +void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped);
>
> void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
> @@@ -502,7 -487,13 +505,13 @@@ static inline int split_huge_page(struc
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> + static inline int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
> + {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> -static inline void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio) {}
> +static inline void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) {}
> #define split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
> do { } while (0)
>
This is now a conflict between the vfs-brauner tree and the mm-stable
tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists