[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240918172026.2532-3-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:20:26 +0000
From: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>,
syzbot+18a87160c7d64ba2e2f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] osfs2: Fix kernel BUG in ocfs2_write_cluster
syzbot has found a kernel BUG in ocfs2_write_cluster_by_desc [1].
The issue arises because ocfs2_insert_extent receives start_blk
as 0, which incorrectly maps to a physical address of 0. This
occurs when block is 0 after the call to ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks
which is invoked inside the ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree. The block
value is then passed to ocfs2_insert_extent, leading to the problem.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=18a87160c7d64ba2e2f6
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+18a87160c7d64ba2e2f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=18a87160c7d64ba2e2f6
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 395e23920..926ffeed8 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -4843,6 +4843,13 @@ int ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree(handle_t *handle,
}
block = ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(osb->sb, bit_off);
+ if (block == 0) {
+ mlog(ML_ERROR, "Conversion resulted in zero block number");
+ status = -EIO;
+ need_free = 1;
+ goto bail;
+ }
+
trace_ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree(
(unsigned long long)ocfs2_metadata_cache_owner(et->et_ci),
bit_off, num_bits);
--
2.46.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists