[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240919075539.27f5b782@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:55:39 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the s390 tree
Hi Jason,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 23:28:11 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 11:26 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > 0147addc4fb7 ("s390/facility: Disable compile time optimization for decompressor code")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > 26d4959681e3 ("s390/facility: Disable compile time optimization for decompressor code")
> >
> > in Linus' tree.
>
> From [1]:
>
> "Please note that the first patch of this series is already in linux-next
> [1], but given that it is so small it seems to be the easiest to apply it
> also on your tree; but I'm sure somebody will complain :)"
>
> So I think this is to be expected.
Yeah, no worries. I just report them in case there was a mistake or
lack of communication. Clearly not in this case.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists