[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240918-039d1e3bebf2231bd452a5ad@orel>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:05:13 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>, Weiwei Li <liwei1518@...il.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@...tanamicro.com>, Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@...ux.alibaba.com>, qemu-riscv@...gnu.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] target/riscv: enable floating point unit
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 06:45:21PM GMT, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
...
> When thinking about the migration of virtual machines shouldn't QEMU be in
> control of the initial state of vcpus instead of KVM?
>
Thinking about this more, I'm inclined to agree. Initial state and reset
state should be traits of the VMM (potentially influenced by the user)
rather than KVM.
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists