[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2614633.1726742450@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:40:50 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] afs: Fix setting of the server responding flag
In afs_wait_for_operation(), we set transcribe the call responded flag to
the server record that we used after doing the fileserver iteration loop -
but it's possible to exit the loop having had a response from the server
that we've discarded (e.g. it returned an abort or we started receiving
data, but the call didn't complete).
This means that op->server might be NULL, but we don't check that before
attempting to set the server flag.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Fixes: 98f9fda2057b ("afs: Fold the afs_addr_cursor struct in")
---
fs/afs/fs_operation.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/fs_operation.c b/fs/afs/fs_operation.c
index 3546b087e791..f9602c9a3257 100644
--- a/fs/afs/fs_operation.c
+++ b/fs/afs/fs_operation.c
@@ -197,13 +197,12 @@ void afs_wait_for_operation(struct afs_operation *op)
op->call_abort_code = op->call->abort_code;
op->call_error = op->call->error;
op->call_responded = op->call->responded;
+ if (op->call_responded)
+ set_bit(AFS_SERVER_FL_RESPONDING, &op->server->flags);
afs_put_call(op->call);
}
}
- if (op->call_responded)
- set_bit(AFS_SERVER_FL_RESPONDING, &op->server->flags);
-
if (!afs_op_error(op)) {
_debug("success");
op->ops->success(op);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists