[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuwYYqsBR-uL7F4J@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:26:10 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: xiaoning.wang@....com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag in
request_irq()
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 07:18:45PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On 2024/9/19 18:47, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This now enabled the interrupt in the case where we previously would've
> > disabled it - I would have expected the condition on the if statement to
> > be reversed?
> It enabled the if statement rather than the else because the else
> statement has been removed.
Ah, yes - I'd missed the else there.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists