lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvogXyYP1LqF3fbjZGHHDL6BFZ2ZKu5JAASnK_brgnymf0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:13:10 -0700
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, 
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf build: Require at least clang 16.0.6 to build
 BPF skeletons

Hello,

I'm able to reproduce it on Ubuntu 24.

perf $ cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION_ID="24.04"
VERSION="24.04.1 LTS (Noble Numbat)"
VERSION_CODENAME=noble
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/"
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy"
UBUNTU_CODENAME=noble
LOGO=ubuntu-logo

perf $ uname -r
6.11.0-061100-generic

perf $ git log
commit 4c1af9bf97eb56d069421c3233ce61608458d5c8 (HEAD)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 10 13:54:23 2024 -0300

    perf trace: If a syscall arg is marked as 'const', assume it is
coming _from_ userspace


perf $ clang -v
Ubuntu clang version 15.0.7
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /bin
Found candidate GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13
Selected GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13
Candidate multilib: .;@m64
Selected multilib: .;@m64

perf $ ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
libbpf: prog 'sys_enter_rename': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'sys_enter_rename': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; int sys_enter_rename(struct syscall_enter_args *args) @
augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:275


With clang-16:

perf $ clang -v
Ubuntu clang version 16.0.6 (23ubuntu4)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /bin
Found candidate GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13
Selected GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13
Candidate multilib: .;@m64
Selected multilib: .;@m64

perf $ ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
     0.000 ( 0.021 ms): sudo/4741 write(fd: 8, buf:
\27[?25l\27[37m\27[48;5;96m\27[H[trace] , count: 205) =

> I'll try to build it and see. But Ubuntu 22 only has clang 11 to 15 so
> making 16 the minimum could be an issue.

Yes, I think disabling any distro that doesn't come with clang 16
(released in 2023) is not a good idea. I'll try to tame the BPF
verifier.

Thanks,
Howard

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 10:37 AM Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello James and Arnaldo,
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 3:42 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 7:20 AM James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/09/2024 15:50, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:40:32PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> >> >> On 11/09/2024 13:24, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> >>> Howard reported problems using perf features that use BPF:
> >> >
> >> >>>     perf $ clang -v
> >> >>>     Debian clang version 15.0.6
> >> >>>     Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> >> >>>     Thread model: posix
> >> >>>     InstalledDir: /bin
> >> >>>     Found candidate GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12
> >> >>>     Selected GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12
> >> >>>     Candidate multilib: .;@m64
> >> >>>     Selected multilib: .;@m64
> >> >>>     perf $ ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> >> >>>     libbpf: prog 'sys_enter_rename': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
> >> >>>     libbpf: prog 'sys_enter_rename': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> >> >>>     0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But it works with:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     perf $ clang -v
> >> >>>     Debian clang version 16.0.6 (15~deb12u1)
> >> >>>     Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> >> >>>     Thread model: posix
> >> >>>     InstalledDir: /bin
> >> >>>     Found candidate GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12
> >> >>>     Selected GCC installation: /bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12
> >> >>>     Candidate multilib: .;@m64
> >> >>>     Selected multilib: .;@m64
> >> >>>     perf $ ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> >> >>>          0.000 ( 0.009 ms): gmain/1448 write(fd: 4, buf: \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, count: 8)                         = 8 (kworker/0:0-eve)
> >> >>>     perf $
> >> >>>
> >> >>> So lets make that the required version, if you happen to have a slightly
> >> >>> older version where this work, please report so that we can adjust the
> >> >>> minimum required version.
> >> >
> >> >> I wasn't able to reproduce the issue with either of these versions. But I
> >> >> suppose it could be an issue with only 15.0.6.
> >> >
> >> > Interesting, that complicates things, probably the best way then is to
> >> > try to build it, if it fails, mention that 15.0.6 is known to be
> >> > problematic and suggest working versions?
> >> >
> >> > - Arnaldo
> >>
> >> I still wasn't able to reproduce it with 15.0.6. And I double checked
> >> with V=1 that the build was using the right clang. I suppose it could be
> >> a build configuration issue, or maybe with a different kernel version?
> >
> >
> > Howard? If not reproducible we can revert it.
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> >
> >>
> >> $  uname --kernel-release
> >> 6.8.0-76060800daily20240311-generic
> >>
> >> $ ../../llvm-project/build/bin/clang -v
> >> clang version 15.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
> >> 088f33605d8a61ff519c580a71b1dd57d16a03f8)
> >> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >> Thread model: posix
> >> InstalledDir: /home/james/workspace/linux/linux/../../llvm-project/build/bin
> >> Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11
> >> Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12
> >> Selected GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12
> >> Candidate multilib: .;@m64
> >> Selected multilib: .;@m64
> >>
> >> $ git log
> >> commit 003265bb6f028d7bcd7cbd92d6ba2b4e26382796
> >> (perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next)
> >>
> >> $ make O=../build/local/ CLANG=../../llvm-project/build/bin/clang -C \
> >>    tools/perf
> >>
> >> $ perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> >>
> >>       0.000 ( 0.026 ms): gnome-shell/5454 write(fd: 5, buf:
> >>         0x7fffa102d9b0, count: 8)                           = 8
>
> Thanks for the effort! But this output seems to be unaugmented? I
> think you are testing the perf/perf-tools-next branch that's slightly
> older (perf mem: Fix the wrong reference in parse_record_events()
> 003265bb6f028d7bcd7cbd92d6ba2b4e26382796), and I think that doesn't
> have the new perf trace feature yet...
>
> That's why the perf trace output looks like:
>
> >> $ perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> >>
> >>       0.000 ( 0.026 ms): gnome-shell/5454 write(fd: 5, buf:
> >>         0x7fffa102d9b0, count: 8)
>
> With the new buffer augmentation it should look like this:
>
> perf $ ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
>      0.000 ( 0.011 ms): gmain/1408 write(fd: 4, buf: \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0,
> count: 8)                         =
>
> The new perf trace can be found on
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/
> perf-tools-next
>
> perf $ git log
> commit 1de5b5dcb8353f36581c963df2d359a5f151a0be (HEAD ->
> struct-aug-arnaldo-2, perf/perf-tools-next)
>
> Also, if you want to test the clang, you may want to checkout to the
> commit before the clang-16 guard (otherwise you can't test different
> clang version).
>
> perf $ git log --oneline
> 1de5b5dcb835 (HEAD -> struct-aug-arnaldo-2, perf/perf-tools-next) perf
> trace: Mark the 'head' arg in the set_robust_list syscall as coming
> from user space
> 0c1019e3463b perf trace: Mark the 'rseq' arg in the rseq syscall as
> coming from user space
> edf3ce0ed38e perf env: Find correct branch counter info on hybrid
> 9953807c9e01 perf evlist: Print hint for group
> eb9b9a6f5ab3 tools: Drop nonsensical -O6
> 89c0a55e550e perf pmu: To info add event_type_desc
> f08cc258431d perf evsel: Add accessor for tool_event
> 925320737ae2 perf pmus: Fake PMU clean up
> d3d5c1a00fcd perf list: Avoid potential out of bounds memory read
> 4ae354d73a8e perf help: Fix a typo ("bellow")
> 74298dd8acb8 perf ftrace: Detect whether ftrace is enabled on system
> 83420d5f5863 perf test shell probe_vfs_getname: Remove extraneous '='
> from probe line number regex
> 9327f0ecad48 perf build: Require at least clang 16.0.6 to build BPF
> skeletons. **********[[[[[[[[[[[[!!!!(This is the clang
> guard)]]]]]]]]]]*****
> 4c1af9bf97eb perf trace: If a syscall arg is marked as 'const', assume
> it is coming _from_ userspace
> e37b315c17df perf parse-events: Remove duplicated include in parse-events.c
>
> My machine is debian 12, and I cannot build perf trace with the new
> augmentation feature on clang-13, clang-14, and clang-15.
>
> perf $ uname -r
> 6.11.0-061100rc7-generic
>
> perf $ git log
> commit 4c1af9bf97eb56d069421c3233ce61608458d5c8 (HEAD)
>
> perf $ make CLANG=/bin/clang-13 && ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> ...
> libbpf: prog 'sys_enter': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
> libbpf: prog 'sys_enter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
> ; int sys_enter(struct syscall_enter_args *args) @
> augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:509
> 0: (bf) r7 = r1                       ; R1=ctx() R7_w=ctx()
>
>
> perf $ make CLANG=/bin/clang-14 && ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> ...
> libbpf: prog 'sys_enter': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
> libbpf: prog 'sys_enter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
> ; int sys_enter(struct syscall_enter_args *args) @
> augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:509
>
>
> perf $ make CLANG=/bin/clang-15 && ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
> libbpf: prog 'sys_enter': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
> libbpf: prog 'sys_enter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
>
>
> perf $ make CLANG=/bin/clang-16 && ./perf trace -e write --max-events=1
>      0.000 ( 0.010 ms): gmain/1408 write(fd: 4, buf: \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0,
> count: 8)                         =
>
>
> Anyway thank you so much, I'll try to reproduce it on Ubuntu, like you
> mentioned.
>
> Thanks,
> Howard
>
>
> >>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ