[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <zvzrjkacazxbv4cjxcnihv4rb2t3tu2zjd6zkny63ygfifpz7i@j4saijws5rcp>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:27:17 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
Adrián Martínez Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add GPU power domain
regulator dependency for RK3588
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:33:25PM GMT, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> On 2024-09-19 11:12, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Enabling the GPU power domain requires that the GPU regulator is
> > enabled. The regulator is enabled at boot time, but automatically
> > gets disabled when there are no users.
> >
> > If the GPU driver is not probed at boot time or rebound while
> > the system is running the system will try to enable the power
> > domain before the regulator is enabled resulting in a failure
> > hanging the whole system. Avoid this by adding an explicit
> > dependency.
> >
> > Reported-by: Adrián Martínez Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>
> > Tested-by: Adrian Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com> # On Rock 5B
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-armsom-sige7.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-coolpi-cm5.dtsi | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-friendlyelec-cm3588.dtsi | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-jaguar.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-ok3588-c.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5-itx.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-tiger.dtsi | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-coolpi-4b.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-khadas-edge2.dts | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-orangepi-5.dts | 4 ++++
> > 12 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Any reason why following rk3588 DTs was not updated?
>
> rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> rk3588-quartzpro64.dts
These two I skipped initially, since they have the GPU regulators
always enabled due to the coupling. I'm not 100% sure if the GPU
or the GPU-MEM regulator (or both) are required for the GPU power
domain.
> rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
> rk3588s-gameforce-ace.dts
> rk3588s-odroid-m2.dts
... And these I missed, since they are new.
I don't have enough time to prepare a v3 before my vacation.
Note, that not describing the regulator just keeps the current
behaviour.
> I also expect we may need to define domain-supply for the npu on
> rk3588 and also both gpu and npu on rk356x in a future series.
Yes, I already discussed that in Vienna with Heiko and Tomeu. The
binding change also allows adding a regulator to the NPU power
domain.
> Similar freeze issue has been observed on rk356x when booting vendor
> kernel with npu support enabled using mainline U-Boot and DT [1].
>
> To work around that issue on rk356x the npu regulator could be changed
> to always-on/boot-on to get past the kernel freeze [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/7025#issuecomment-2291067748
> [2] https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/commit/da31da4b68f858f54364a21b0dd00fef2ab0d0d6
Yes, that looks like the same issue and I guess the changes to the Rockchip
power-domain driver should also work for rk356x. I don't have one, though.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists