[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd5bf25938ec45815dcbd312522bcafe84e6f05e.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:35:48 +0000
From: "Colberg, Peter" <peter.colberg@...el.com>
To: "yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com" <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>, "linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>, "mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>, "Wu, Hao"
<hao.wu@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "russ.weight@...ux.dev"
<russ.weight@...ux.dev>, "Pagani, Marco" <marpagan@...hat.com>,
"trix@...hat.com" <trix@...hat.com>, "matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com"
<matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/9] fpga: dfl: migrate FPGA Management Engine
driver to dfl_feature_dev_data
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 17:38 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:39:37PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > This change separates out most of the symbol name changes required by this
> > patch series for the file: drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c. This is done to
> > split a single monolithic change into multiple, smaller patches at the
> > request of the maintainer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@...el.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Split monolithic patch into series at request of maintainer
> > - Change fme_hdr_ioctl_*() to receive dfl_feature_dev_data instead of
> > dfl_feature_platform_data.
> > - Remove unused local variable pdata in fme_dev_{init,destroy}().
> > ---
> > drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c
> > index 864924f68f5e..7f119b09b54e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c
> > @@ -135,10 +135,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group fme_hdr_group = {
> > .attrs = fme_hdr_attrs,
> > };
> >
> > -static long fme_hdr_ioctl_release_port(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata,
> > +static long fme_hdr_ioctl_release_port(struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > - struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev = pdata->dfl_cdev;
> > + struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev = fdata->dfl_cdev;
> > int port_id;
> >
> > if (get_user(port_id, (int __user *)arg))
> > @@ -147,10 +147,10 @@ static long fme_hdr_ioctl_release_port(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata,
> > return dfl_fpga_cdev_release_port(cdev, port_id);
> > }
> >
> > -static long fme_hdr_ioctl_assign_port(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata,
> > +static long fme_hdr_ioctl_assign_port(struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > - struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev = pdata->dfl_cdev;
> > + struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev = fdata->dfl_cdev;
> > int port_id;
> >
> > if (get_user(port_id, (int __user *)arg))
> > @@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ static long fme_hdr_ioctl(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > struct dfl_feature *feature,
> > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > - struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> Maybe firstly make a patch to:
>
> #define to_dfl_feature_platform_data dev_get_platdata
>
> And s/to_dfl_feature_platform_data/dev_get_platdata
>
> Then we could do replacements in this patch more friendly.
I have combined the pdata -> fdata replacements into a single patch
"fpga: dfl: refactor functions to take/return feature device data",
which adds two aliases and refactors the code accordingly:
#define dfl_feature_dev_data dfl_feature_platform_data
#define to_dfl_feature_dev_data dev_get_platdata
>
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata = to_dfl_feature_dev_data(&pdev->dev);
> >
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case DFL_FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE:
> > - return fme_hdr_ioctl_release_port(pdata, arg);
> > + return fme_hdr_ioctl_release_port(fdata, arg);
> > case DFL_FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN:
> > - return fme_hdr_ioctl_assign_port(pdata, arg);
> > + return fme_hdr_ioctl_assign_port(fdata, arg);
> > }
> >
> > return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -411,14 +411,14 @@ static int power_hwmon_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > static int power_hwmon_write(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > u32 attr, int channel, long val)
> > {
> > - struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev->parent);
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata = to_dfl_feature_dev_data(dev);
> > struct dfl_feature *feature = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > int ret = 0;
> > u64 v;
> >
> > val = clamp_val(val / MICRO, 0, PWR_THRESHOLD_MAX);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&fdata->lock);
> >
> > switch (attr) {
> > case hwmon_power_max:
> > @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static int power_hwmon_write(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fdata->lock);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static struct dfl_feature_driver fme_feature_drvs[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > -static long fme_ioctl_check_extension(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata,
> > +static long fme_ioctl_check_extension(struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > /* No extension support for now */
> > @@ -600,19 +600,21 @@ static int fme_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > {
> > struct platform_device *fdev = dfl_fpga_inode_to_feature_dev(inode);
> > struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&fdev->dev);
>
> Why not do the same replacement here?
This has been prepared in the patch "fpga: dfl: omit unneeded null
pointer check from {afu,fme}_open()" followed by the pdata -> fdata
replacement in "fpga: dfl: refactor functions to take/return feature
device data".
>
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata;
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(!pdata))
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > - ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(pdata, filp->f_flags & O_EXCL);
> > + fdata = pdata;
> > + mutex_lock(&fdata->lock);
> > + ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(fdata, filp->f_flags & O_EXCL);
> > if (!ret) {
> > dev_dbg(&fdev->dev, "Device File Opened %d Times\n",
> > - dfl_feature_dev_use_count(pdata));
> > + dfl_feature_dev_use_count(fdata));
> > filp->private_data = pdata;
> > }
> > - mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fdata->lock);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -620,19 +622,20 @@ static int fme_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > static int fme_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > {
> > struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = filp->private_data;
> > - struct platform_device *pdev = pdata->dev;
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata = pdata;
>
> ditto.
This has been done in "fpga: dfl: refactor functions to take/return
feature device data".
>
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = fdata->dev;
> > struct dfl_feature *feature;
> >
> > dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Device File Release\n");
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > - dfl_feature_dev_use_end(pdata);
> > + mutex_lock(&fdata->lock);
> > + dfl_feature_dev_use_end(fdata);
> >
> > - if (!dfl_feature_dev_use_count(pdata))
> > - dfl_fpga_dev_for_each_feature(pdata, feature)
> > + if (!dfl_feature_dev_use_count(fdata))
> > + dfl_fpga_dev_for_each_feature(fdata, feature)
> > dfl_fpga_set_irq_triggers(feature, 0,
> > feature->nr_irqs, NULL);
> > - mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fdata->lock);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -640,7 +643,8 @@ static int fme_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > static long fme_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = filp->private_data;
> > - struct platform_device *pdev = pdata->dev;
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata = pdata;
>
> ditto
This has been done in "fpga: dfl: refactor functions to take/return
feature device data".
Thanks,
Peter
>
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = fdata->dev;
> > struct dfl_feature *f;
> > long ret;
> >
> > @@ -650,7 +654,7 @@ static long fme_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > case DFL_FPGA_GET_API_VERSION:
> > return DFL_FPGA_API_VERSION;
> > case DFL_FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION:
> > - return fme_ioctl_check_extension(pdata, arg);
> > + return fme_ioctl_check_extension(fdata, arg);
> > default:
> > /*
> > * Let sub-feature's ioctl function to handle the cmd.
> > @@ -658,7 +662,7 @@ static long fme_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > * handled in this sub feature, and returns 0 or other
> > * error code if cmd is handled.
> > */
> > - dfl_fpga_dev_for_each_feature(pdata, f) {
> > + dfl_fpga_dev_for_each_feature(fdata, f) {
> > if (f->ops && f->ops->ioctl) {
> > ret = f->ops->ioctl(pdev, f, cmd, arg);
> > if (ret != -ENODEV)
> > @@ -672,27 +676,27 @@ static long fme_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >
> > static int fme_dev_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata = to_dfl_feature_dev_data(&pdev->dev);
> > struct dfl_fme *fme;
> >
> > fme = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*fme), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!fme)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > - dfl_fpga_pdata_set_private(pdata, fme);
> > - mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&fdata->lock);
> > + dfl_fpga_fdata_set_private(fdata, fme);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fdata->lock);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static void fme_dev_destroy(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct dfl_feature_dev_data *fdata = to_dfl_feature_dev_data(&pdev->dev);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > - dfl_fpga_pdata_set_private(pdata, NULL);
> > - mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&fdata->lock);
> > + dfl_fpga_fdata_set_private(fdata, NULL);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fdata->lock);
> > }
> >
> > static const struct file_operations fme_fops = {
> > --
> > 2.44.0
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists