lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41fdfc47-4161-d2e4-6528-4079b660424f@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:58:31 +0800
From: "Liao, Chang" <liaochang1@...wei.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: uprobes: Optimize cache flushes for xol slot



在 2024/9/19 22:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> On 09/19, Liao Chang wrote:
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
>> @@ -17,12 +17,16 @@ void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
>>  	void *xol_page_kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
>>  	void *dst = xol_page_kaddr + (vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK);
>>
>> +	if (!memcmp(dst, src, len))
>> +		goto done;
> 
> can't really comment, I know nothing about arm64...
> 
> but don't we need to change __create_xol_area()
> 
> 	-	area->page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> 	+	area->page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO);
> 
> to avoid the false positives?

Indeed, it would be safer.

Could we tolerate these false positives? Even if the page are not reset
to zero bits, if the existing bits are the same as the instruction being
copied, it still can execute the correct instruction.

> 
> Oleg.
> 
> 

-- 
BR
Liao, Chang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ