[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB713412D068F202057A71CDE8896C2@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:44:59 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de"
<bp@...en8.de>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "Luck,
Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "CobeChen@...oxin.com" <CobeChen@...oxin.com>, "TimGuo@...oxin.com"
<TimGuo@...oxin.com>, "LeoLiu-oc@...oxin.com" <LeoLiu-oc@...oxin.com>, "Lyle
Li" <LyleLi@...oxin.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/mce: Add CMCI storm switching support for
Zhaoxin
> From: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
> [...]
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/zhaoxin.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/zhaoxin.c
> >> @@ -63,3 +63,21 @@ void mce_zhaoxin_feature_clear(struct cpuinfo_x86
> >> *c) {
> >> intel_clear_lmce();
> >> }
> >> +
> >> +void mce_zhaoxin_handle_storm(int bank, bool on) {
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> + u64 val;
> >> +
> >> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> >> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> >> + if (on) {
> >> + val &= ~(MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN |
> >> MCI_CTL2_CMCI_THRESHOLD_MASK);
> >> + val |= CMCI_STORM_THRESHOLD;
> >> + } else {
> >> + val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_THRESHOLD_MASK;
> >> + val |= (MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN | cmci_threshold[bank]);
> >> + }
> >> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> >> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags); }
> >
> > Are there any reasons or comments why it needs to disable/enable the
> > CMCI interrupt here during a CMCI storm on/off? If not, then reuse
> > mce_intel_handle_storm() to avoid duplicating the code.
> >
>
> As explained in another email.
> The reason is actually mentioned in the cover letter: "because Zhaoxin's UCR
> error is not reported through CMCI", and we want to disable CMCI interrupt
> when CMCI storm happened.
So, this is just you want to disable CMCI when a CMCI storm happens.
This doesn't explain much to me.
What's the problem if not disable CMCI when a CMCI storm happens?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists