[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240920150952.bqzxuhnvgh6zx5rg@quack3>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:09:52 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomzhao@....com>
Cc: jack@...e.com, zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] udf: refactor udf_current_aext() to handle error
On Wed 18-09-24 17:36:32, Zhao Mengmeng wrote:
> From: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn>
>
> As Jan suggested in links below, refactor udf_current_aext() to
> differentiate between error and "hit EOF", it now takes pointer to etype
> to store the extent type, return 0 when get etype success; return -ENODATA
> when hit EOF; return -EINVAL when i_alloc_type invalid.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912111235.6nr3wuqvktecy3vh@quack3/
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn>
Two comments below.
> @@ -1999,10 +2000,12 @@ int udf_setup_indirect_aext(struct inode *inode, udf_pblk_t block,
> if (epos->offset + adsize > sb->s_blocksize) {
> struct kernel_lb_addr cp_loc;
> uint32_t cp_len;
> - int cp_type;
> + int8_t cp_type;
>
> epos->offset -= adsize;
> - cp_type = udf_current_aext(inode, epos, &cp_loc, &cp_len, 0);
> + err = udf_current_aext(inode, epos, &cp_loc, &cp_len, &cp_type, 0);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto err_out;
> cp_len |= ((uint32_t)cp_type) << 30;
>
> __udf_add_aext(inode, &nepos, &cp_loc, cp_len, 1);
> @@ -2017,6 +2020,9 @@ int udf_setup_indirect_aext(struct inode *inode, udf_pblk_t block,
> *epos = nepos;
>
> return 0;
> +err_out:
> + brelse(epos->bh);
> + return err;
> }
So here I don't think we want to release epos->bh. Rather we need to
release 'bh' itself which we have got because we did't replace epos->bh yet
with it.
> @@ -2167,9 +2173,12 @@ int8_t udf_next_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
> {
> int8_t etype;
> unsigned int indirections = 0;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + while ((err = udf_current_aext(inode, epos, eloc, elen, &etype, inc))) {
> + if (err || etype != (EXT_NEXT_EXTENT_ALLOCDESCS >> 30))
> + break;
>
> - while ((etype = udf_current_aext(inode, epos, eloc, elen, inc)) ==
> - (EXT_NEXT_EXTENT_ALLOCDESCS >> 30)) {
> udf_pblk_t block;
>
> if (++indirections > UDF_MAX_INDIR_EXTS) {
> @@ -2190,14 +2199,14 @@ int8_t udf_next_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
> }
> }
>
> - return etype;
> + return err;
> }
This doesn't look right. Probably it gets fixed up in the following patches
but here should be something like: !err ? etype : -1
to keep udf_next_aext() compatible with its users.
Otherwise the patch looks good.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists