linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for qcom_smmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66af599b-85a7-40fd-b550-346013028394@quicinc.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:29:04 +0530
From: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <robdclark@...il.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
        <joro@...tes.org>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <quic_c_gdjako@...cinc.com>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for
 qcom_smmu_500



On 9/20/2024 9:48 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 09:28:13PM GMT, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
>> Add ACTLR data table for qcom_smmu_500 including
>> corresponding data entry and set prefetch value by
>> way of a list of compatible strings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 4ac272d05843..e8f936a446df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -25,8 +25,31 @@
>>
>>   #define CPRE			(1 << 1)
>>   #define CMTLB			(1 << 0)
>> +#define PREFETCH_SHIFT		8
>> +#define PREFETCH_DEFAULT	0
>> +#define PREFETCH_SHALLOW	(1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>> +#define PREFETCH_MODERATE	(2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>> +#define PREFETCH_DEEP		(3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>>   #define GFX_ACTLR_PRR		(1 << 5)
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_actlr_client_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,adreno",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,adreno-gmu",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,adreno-smmu",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,fastrpc",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-mdss",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-venus",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-mdss",
>> +			.data = (const void *) (PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB) },
>> +	{ }
>> +};
> 
> Wow, this looks really nice now!
> 

I am also in favor of this compatible based approach now,
as it looks to be much cleaner implementation.

>> +
>>   static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>   {
>>   	return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
>> @@ -640,6 +663,7 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
>>   	.impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
>>   	.adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
>>   	.cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
>> +	.client_match = qcom_smmu_actlr_client_of_match,
>>   };
>>
>>   /*
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>