linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v7 0/7] udmabuf bug fix and some improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <IA0PR11MB7185E6C790F112FE898921CBF86D2@IA0PR11MB7185.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:04:50 +0000
From: "Kasireddy, Vivek" <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
To: Huan Yang <link@...o.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, "Gerd
 Hoffmann" <kraxel@...hat.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, "Andrew
 Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-media@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org"
	<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "opensource.kernel@...o.com" <opensource.kernel@...o.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/7] udmabuf bug fix and some improvements

Hi Huan,

> Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] udmabuf bug fix and some improvements
> 
> This patchset attempts to fix some errors in udmabuf and remove the
> upin_list structure, also try clean up code.
> 
> By this patchset, udmabuf remove page struct relay, only use
> pfn and folios.
> 
> Some of this fix just gather the patches which I upload before.
> 
> Any patch has passed the udmabuf self-test suite's tests.
> Suggested by Kasireddy, Vivek <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
> Patch6 modified the unpin function, therefore running the udmabuf
> self-test program in a loop did not reveal any memory leaks.
> 
> Notice: Test item 6 maybe requires running the command:
>   echo 1024 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages 

Thank you for the patches. Series applied to drm-misc-next.

Thanks,
Vivek

> Changelog
> ===
>   v6 - > v7:
>     A little change, update some commit message.
>     Patch3: add fixes tag.
>     Patch4: update ack tag, remove the redundant if (!memfd) check from
>             check_memfd_seals(). update commit message.
>     Patch6: update commit message to describe how unpin array worked.
>     Patch7: update commit message to describe why need reuse the folios
>             array.
>   v5 -> v6:
>     Patch1 use Vivek's comments(thank you), fix code style, update ack-tag.
>     Patch2, 3 no change.
>     Patch4 fix memfd miss fput, use Vivek's comments(thank you),
>            fix code style, update suggested-by.
>     Patch5 update ack-tag, fix error word in commit message.
>     Patch6 update ack-tag, use xmas style.
>     Patch7 update ack-tag, remove unused ret variable.
> 
> ---
>   v4 -> v5:
>     Patch1 doc why pre-fault failed not report error.
>     Patch2 no change
>     Patch3 update ack tag marked in v4
>     Patch4 split some change into patch5 and patch7, this only contains
>            udmabuf pin folio's function
>     Patch5 add helper init/deini to clean udmabuf struct initialized
>     Patch6 remove unnecessary code
>     Patch7 remove reuse folio remove v4 patch4
> 
> ---
>   v3 -> v4:
>     Patch1 fill vma area with pfn only when true access.
>     Patch2 no change
>     Patch3 select VMAP_PFN
>     Patch4 use function pin each item.
>     Patch5 use pinned folio array instead udmabuf_folio struct.
> 
> ---
>   v2 -> v3:
>     Patch1, avoid use page, instead, use pfn, and use vmf_insert_pfn map
>     suggested-by Kasireddy, Vivek <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
> 
>     Patch2, update acked-by Kasireddy, Vivek <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>
>     And keep the kvcalloc on the same line.
> 
>     Patch3, avoid use page, instead, use pfn, then use vmap_pfn map
> 
>     Patch4, split v2 patch4, single update codestyle to keep review
>     easy.
> 
>     Patch5, another way to remove udmabuf_folio
> 
> ---
>   v1 -> v2:
>     Patch1, 3 Rectify the improper use of the sg table.
>     suggested-by Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> 
>     Patch2 add acked-by Christian K�nig <christian.koenig@....com> which
>     marked in v1
> 
>     Patch4
>     Modify the data structure to restore the use of pages and
>     correct the misunderstanding of loop conditions such as "pgcnt".
>     make sure pass self test.
> 
>     remove v1's patch4
> v6
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240909091851.1165742-1-link@vivo.com/
> v5
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240903083818.3071759-1-link@vivo.com/
> v4
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240822084342.1574914-1-link@vivo.com/
> v3
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240813090518.3252469-1-link@vivo.com/
> v2
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240805032550.3912454-1-link@vivo.com/
> v1
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240801104512.4056860-1-link@vivo.com/
> 
> Huan Yang (7):
>   udmabuf: pre-fault when first page fault
>   udmabuf: change folios array from kmalloc to kvmalloc
>   udmabuf: fix vmap_udmabuf error page set
>   udmabuf: udmabuf_create pin folio codestyle cleanup
>   udmabuf: introduce udmabuf init and deinit helper
>   udmabuf: remove udmabuf_folio
>   udmabuf: reuse folio array when pin folios
> 
>  drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig   |   1 +
>  drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 275 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 57f962b956f1d116cd64d5c406776c4975de549d
> --
> 2.45.2