linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: twl: add charger node also for TWL603x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240921005125.GA165161-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:51:25 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, tony@...mide.com,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: twl: add charger node also for
 TWL603x

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/09/2024 10:41, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Also the TWL603X devices have a charger, so allow to specify it here.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml
> > index e94b0fd7af0f8..4064a228cb0fc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml
> > @@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ allOf:
> >              regulator-initial-mode: false
> >  
> >        properties:
> > +        bci:
> 
> charger
> 
> > +          type: object
> 
> additionalProperties: true
> 
> Each node must end with additionalProperties or unevaluated. I think you
> never tested it, because dtschema reports this.

This is under an if/then schema is why there's no errors.

This schema probably should have been 3 with a ti,twl-common.yaml schema 
for the common properties, but I'm not sure it is worth changing now.

Rob