[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240921173027.9425-1-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:30:27 +0000
From: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com>
To: heming.zhao@...e.com
Cc: jlbec@...lplan.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark@...heh.com,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
pvmohammedanees2003@...il.com,
syzbot+18a87160c7d64ba2e2f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] osfs2: Fix kernel BUG in ocfs2_write_cluster
Yes, you are absolutely right, __ocfs2_claim_clusters indeed
allocates 0 as the bit_off, looking into this I believe the
problem is triggered due to ocfs2_search_chain called by
ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits, what do you think would be the best
approach to solve this issue, what function I be looking for,
any insights will be highly appreciated.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists