[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <rz3xk3kwwsfstjrqffp4vfkm7mvn5sdviwjzb5dodmsnb5v2fz@vuamquxmvt4r>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 18:31:52 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: writeback: Introduce drm managed helpers
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 07:28:17PM GMT, Louis Chauvet wrote:
> Currently drm_writeback_connector are created by
> drm_writeback_connector_init or drm_writeback_connector_init_with_encoder.
> Both of the function uses drm_connector_init and drm_encoder_init, but
> there is no way to properly clean those structure from outside. By using
> drm managed variants, we can ensure that the writeback connector is
> properly cleaned.
>
> This patch introduce drmm_writeback_connector_init, an helper to initialize
> a writeback connector using drm managed helpers. This function allows the
> caller to use its own encoder.
Also it introduces drm_writeback_connector_cleanup(). Ideally that
should be a separate commit with a proper description. You should also
document that existing users should call that function (and maybe add a
WARN_ON that can check if the function wasn't called).
Last, but not least, please don't add API without a user. Please switch
at least one driver into using this API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
> ---
> Hi Maxime, Jani,
>
> I tried with this commit to implement the drm-managed version of writeback
> connector initialization. I tested with the current vkms driver, and it
> seems to works (at least no crash/warns).
>
> As suggested by Jani, I only created one function, which takes a
> NULL-able pointer for encoder/encoder functions/possible_crtc. What do you
> think about it?
>
> Regarding the documentation, I think I repeated too much, can I simply add
> comments like "see documentation of @... for the details / requirements"?
>
> Good weekend,
> Louis Chauvet
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_writeback.c | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/drm/drm_writeback.h | 7 ++
> 2 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists