lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02076f9d-1158-4f3e-85cc-83ee4d41091e@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:02:55 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Wander Lairson Costa
	<wander@...hat.com>
CC: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] igbvf: remove unused spinlock

On 9/21/24 14:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Wander,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Am 20.09.24 um 20:59 schrieb Wander Lairson Costa:
>> tx_queue_lock and stats_lock are declared and initialized, but never
>> used. Remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
> 
> It’d be great if you added a Fixes: tag.

Alternatively you could split this series into two, and send this patch
to iwl-next tree, without the fixes tag. For me this patch is just
a cleanup, not a fix.

> 

[...]

> 
> With that addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ