linux-kernel - [PATCH] ftrace: Hide a extra entry in stack trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240923035916.6567-1-tatsuya.s2862@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:59:15 +0900
From: Tatsuya S <tatsuya.s2862@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Tatsuya S <tatsuya.s2862@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Hide a extra entry in stack trace

A extra entry is shown on stack trace(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y).

    [003] .....   110.171589: vfs_write <-__x64_sys_write
    [003] .....   110.171600: <stack trace>
 => XXXXXXXXX (Wrong function name)
 => vfs_write
 => __x64_sys_write
 => do_syscall_64
 => entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

To resolve this, increment skip in __ftrace_trace_stack().
The reason why skip is incremented in __ftrace_trace_stack()
is because __ftrace_trace_stack() in stack trace is the only function
that wasn't skipped from anywhere.

Signed-off-by: Tatsuya S <tatsuya.s2862@...il.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index c3b2c7dfadef..e0d98621ff23 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -2919,6 +2919,8 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
 #ifndef CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC
 	if (!regs)
 		skip++;
+#else
+	skip++;
 #endif
 
 	preempt_disable_notrace();
-- 
2.46.1