[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e523949b-876e-4c23-8268-b4baa39aca65@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:23:14 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, yanjiewtw@...il.com,
kim.phillips@....com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, leitao@...ian.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
jithu.joseph@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, sandipan.das@....com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, peternewman@...gle.com,
maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com, james.morse@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/24] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display
number of monitoring counters
Hi Reinette,
On 9/19/24 11:32, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 9/4/24 3:21 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> The mbm_assign_cntr mode provides an option to the user to assign a
>> hardware counter to an RMID, event pair and monitor the bandwidth as
>
> Could you please be consistent in this series in how you refer to
> an RMID, event pair ? For example later it becomes RMID-event pair.
Will keep it as "an RMID, event pair" in all the references.
>
>
>> long as the counter is assigned. Number of assignments depend on number
>> of monitoring counters available.
>>
>> Provide the interface to display the number of monitoring counters
>> supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>> v7: Minor commit log text changes.
>>
>> v6: No changes.
>>
>> v5: Changed the display name from num_cntrs to num_mbm_cntrs.
>> Updated the commit message.
>> Moved the patch after mbm_mode is introduced.
>>
>> v4: Changed the counter name to num_cntrs. And few text changes.
>>
>> v3: Changed the field name to mbm_assign_cntrs.
>>
>> v2: Changed the field name to mbm_assignable_counters from abmc_counte
>> ---
>> Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> index a7b17ad8acb9..3e9302971faf 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> @@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ with the following files:
>> than 'num_mbm_cntrs' to be created. Reading the mbm files may report 'Unavailable'
>> if there is no hardware resource assigned.
>>
>> +"num_mbm_cntrs":
>> + The number of monitoring counters available for assignment.
>> +
>
> I think it will be helpful if the changelog and the above doc notes when this file can
> be expected to be visible since its visibility is not connected to visibility of
Sure.
> "mbm_assign_mode" that refers to it. There also seems to be a conflict here where
> "mbm_assign_mode" documentation contains section about "default" that refers to
> "num_mbm_cntrs", but "num_mbm_cntrs" may not be visible if "default" is the only mode.
>
Yes. Need to change the reference to "num_rmids" in default section.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists