[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502f1855-09df-4167-a7ab-8cbae0da9348@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:21:12 +0100
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Erez <erezgeva2@...il.com>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: Erez Geva <erezgeva@...ime.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] mtd: spi-nor: core: add manufacturer flags
On 9/23/24 7:04 PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> * Always read Macronix chips SFDP, as Macronix replaced all old chips
>> in the Manufacture table.
> I'll NACK it unless you prove that the old flavors of flashes are not
> used anymore in the kernel.
Even if you can prove that the older flashes are not used in the kernel
anymore, we can't just switch to parsing SFDP, because we have seen in
the past flashes with wrong SFDP data that made the flashes misbehave.
The recommended way is to update just the flashes that you can test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists