[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvHghxL6ce-2y7Wx@pavilion.home>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 23:41:27 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Steven Davis <goldside000@...look.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq_work: Replace wait loop with rcuwait_wait_event
Le Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:43:26AM -0400, Steven Davis a écrit :
> The previous implementation of irq_work_sync used a busy-wait
> loop with cpu_relax() to check the status of IRQ work. This
> approach, while functional, could lead to inefficiencies in
> CPU usage.
>
> This commit replaces the busy-wait loop with the rcuwait_wait_event
> mechanism. This change leverages the RCU wait mechanism to handle
> waiting for IRQ work completion more efficiently, improving CPU
> responsiveness and reducing unnecessary CPU usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Davis <goldside000@...look.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq_work.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index 2f4fb336dda1..2b092a1d07a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -295,8 +295,7 @@ void irq_work_sync(struct irq_work *work)
> return;
> }
>
> - while (irq_work_is_busy(work))
> - cpu_relax();
> + rcuwait_wait_event(&work->irqwait, !irq_work_is_busy(work), TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
So you can remove the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT special case in this function, right?
Thanks.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_sync);
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists