[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1845f326-e9eb-4351-9ed1-fce373c82cb0@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:24:50 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Seunghwan Baek <sh8267.baek@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, avri.altman@....com,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com
Cc: grant.jung@...sung.com, jt77.jang@...sung.com, junwoo80.lee@...sung.com,
dh0421.hwang@...sung.com, jangsub.yi@...sung.com, sh043.lee@...sung.com,
cw9316.lee@...sung.com, wkon.kim@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ufs: core: set SDEV_OFFLINE when ufs shutdown.
On 9/23/24 7:17 PM, Seunghwan Baek wrote:> That's because SSU (Start
Stop Unit) command must be sent during
> shutdown process. If SDEV_OFFLINE is set for wlun, SSU command cannot
> be sent because it is rejected by the scsi layer. Therefore, we
> consider to set SDEV_QUIESCE for wlun, and set SDEV_OFFLINE for other
> lus.
Right. Since ufshcd_wl_shutdown() is expected to stop all DMA related to
the UFS host, shouldn't there be a scsi_device_quiesce(sdev) call after
the __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM) call?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists