[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvMaWrXkgZ9ZHKfS@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:00:26 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] add block size > page size support to ramfs
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:23:49PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> Add block size > page size to ramfs as we support minimum folio order
> allocation in the page cache. The changes are very minimal, and this is
> also a nice way to stress test just the page cache changes for minimum
> folio order.
I don't really see the point of upstreaming this. I'm sure it was
useful for your testing. And splitting the patch in two makes no sense
to me; the combined patch is not large.
> Pankaj Raghav (2):
> ramfs: add blocksize mount option
> ramfs: enable block size > page size
>
> fs/ramfs/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists