[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0886f3fb-4e05-4787-aecc-5a5b8a3b8d73@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 20:59:50 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "tsbogend@...ha.franken.de"
<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Add more RTL9300 variants
On 24/09/24 20:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:57:19AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
>> Add the RTL9301, RTL9300B and RTL9303. These have the same SoC as the
>> RTL9302C but differ in the Ethernet switch/SERDES arrangement.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> Changes in v4:
>> - New
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9302c-switch.yaml | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9302c-switch.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9302c-switch.yaml
>> index 2d20dd07a7e9..a3ba6d9bacaa 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9302c-switch.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9302c-switch.yaml
>> @@ -18,7 +18,10 @@ properties:
>> compatible:
>> items:
>> - enum:
>> + - realtek,rtl9301-switch
>> + - realtek,rtl9302b-switch
>> - realtek,rtl9302c-switch
>> + - realtek,rtl9303-switch
> This should be squashed. One logical change is to add a new binding for
> entire family, not device-by-device.
Yes I did consider that. The main thing that gave me pause for thought
was the file naming thing. If I squash this should I switch back to the
realtek,rtl9300-switch filename? I'll probably add the
realtek,rtl9300-switch fallback as well (and add the chip specific
compatibles for the i2c).
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists