linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs for 6.12-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi=dvXyr8b5Z1cYLa-A=-JpYVpJ854UMvftE2gaK==GMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:24:46 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs for 6.12-rc1

On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 19:42, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> In this series, the main changes include 1) converting major IO paths to use
> folio, and 2) adding various knobs to control GC more flexibly for Zoned
> devices.

Hmm. I get mostly the same merge result as in linux-next, but I did
end up with a difference in f2fs_write_begin(). You might want to
check that out.

That said, the difference is a PAGE_SIZE vs folio_size(folio), and I
think in the end it doesn't matter because I don't think f2fs does
large folios yet.

But please check it regardless.

             Linus