linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] net: pse-pd: tps23881: Fix boolean evaluation for bitmask checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240924103357.1ca3d22f@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:33:57 +0200
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>,
 thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: pse-pd: tps23881: Fix boolean evaluation for
 bitmask checks

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:26:12 +0100
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Don't know about it but if I can remove it from my driver it would be nice.
> > :)  
> 
> Right, no question from my side that this change is a good one.
> I'm just wondering if it is best for net or net-next.

Indeed, I don't know the policy on this. Do you think it shouldn't go to net?
I will let net maintainers decide. ;)

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com