linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [perf/x86/intel] 25dfc9e357: kvm-unit-tests-qemu.pmu.fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZvIoDCpLW6kX8pFw@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:46:36 +0800
From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
	<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [perf/x86/intel] 25dfc9e357:
 kvm-unit-tests-qemu.pmu.fail

hi, Dapeng Mi,

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:17:17AM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> 
> On 9/23/2024 12:31 PM, Oliver Sang wrote:
> > hi, Kan,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 09:27:06AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >>> ...
> >>> .[32mPASS.[0m msr (1836 tests)
> >>> .[31mFAIL.[0m pmu (143 tests, 24 unexpected failures, 14 skipped)  <---
> >> Is there a list to show which checks are failed?
> > I attached a pmu.log.
> >
> > below failed which can pass on parent (v6.11-rc5)
> >
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-0
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-0
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-1
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-1
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: irq-1
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-2
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-2
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-3
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-3
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: irq-3
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-4
> > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-4
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-0
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-0
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-1
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-1
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: irq-1
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-2
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-2
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-3
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-3
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: irq-3
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-4
> > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-4
> 
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> What HW platform do you see this error on? 

it's on a Haswell desktop
test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 16G memory

> If possible, could you please
> apply the previously mentioned KUT/pmu patchset and check if the issue can
> be fixed? Thanks.

do you have a repo/branch? unfortunately, our bot failed to fetch this
patch-set.

> 
> Dapeng Mi
> 
> >
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kan
> >>
> >>> .[32mPASS.[0m pmu_lbr (3 tests)
> >>> .[33mSKIP.[0m pmu_pebs (1 tests, 1 skipped)
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> >>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240920/202409201525.4877023e-oliver.sang@intel.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>